Alameda Multimodal Arterial Plan
Alameda's Countywide Multimodal Arterial Plan seeks to better understand the existing and future role and function of the countywide arterial system and provide a framework for designing, prioritizing and implementing improvements in the context of the surrounding land use to address the needs of all modes on the county's arterial roadways. David worked as a GIS Lead and Planner as part of the Alameda Multimodal Arterial Plan and oversaw developing GIS analysis scripts that evaluated Alameda County’s arterials based a large array of multimodal performance measures and objectives. Along with the multimodal performance and objectives analysis, David worked as the development lead for a GIS Cross Sectional tool design to transform transportation objectives, priorities, and improvements into 3D cross-sections at scale across Alameda County’s arterials that received improvements.
As part of the plan, the project team created an automated GIS cross-sectional evaluation tool and visualization framework intended to enable large scale scenario planning efforts for multimodal transportation system analysis was a key development of the MAP.
The plan consisted of identifying multimodal recommendations across the entire county based on the layered modal priorities identified for every network segment. Metrics were recalculated based on the selected improvements and communicated by mode in the plan.
The plan consisted of identifying multimodal recommendations across the entire county based on the layered modal priorities identified for every network segment. Metrics were recalculated based on the selected improvements and communicated by mode in the plan.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.
The needs assessment for the plan looked at the intersection of modal priorities with each modes respective modal performance objectives. Any place an objective was found to not be met, and the mode was a top modal priority was found to be in need of improvement.